Hollister v Soetoro – Hemenway lead attorney now. Berg, Joyce, Bauer request leave of case.
Notice Filed Hollister v Soetoro I. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT A. The Basis for the District Court’s Subject Matter Jurisdiction The District Court had jurisdiction pursuant to the Federal Interpleader Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1335. Alternatively Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 22 and diversity under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 existed. In addition, in a proposed amended complaint the plaintiff Hollister asserted jurisdiction also for a direct violation of the constitutional requirement in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 concerning the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States if he is not, as is there stated, a “natural born...
Original Article: Forum: News/Activism
Tags: Bauer, Constitutional Requirement, Diversity, Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure, Hollister, Interpleader, Jurisdictional Statement, Lead Attorney, Plaintiff, President Of The United States, Section 1, Subject Matter Jurisdiction, X92